Skip to content

Campaign by Starmer threatens rural Britain's zero-emissions future

Pursuing a net-zero emissions target without consideration for other factors or perspectives

Starmer's rapid push towards zero emissions poses a threat to rural communities in Britain
Starmer's rapid push towards zero emissions poses a threat to rural communities in Britain

Campaign by Starmer threatens rural Britain's zero-emissions future

In the pursuit of a net zero future, rural businesses in the UK face unique hurdles that could potentially derail the nation's climate targets. A new study by Dr. Philip J. Nicholson, a Senior Researcher for ADE: Research, has shed light on these challenges and proposed potential solutions.

Industrial electricity in the UK bears up to 14 times higher policy-related costs than natural gas, creating a fundamental barrier for rural businesses looking to make the switch. This high cost, coupled with challenging grid connections, has led to rural manufacturers, known as the Ayrton archetype, relying on about 80% gas and 20% electricity.

Dr. Nicholson has identified five rural industrial archetypes, each representing common characteristics within the sector. The Ayrton archetype includes rural manufacturers requiring very high temperatures, such as ceramic, glass, cement, and metals processing facilities. The Traditional, Innovative, Opportunistic, Declining, and Transitional archetypes also highlight systemic barriers afflicting rural businesses, including infrastructure limitations, economic barriers, policy misalignments, and capacity constraints.

Over half of the UK's industrial emissions come from rural factories, distilleries, and workshops. Many of these businesses encounter insufficient electrical capacity for transitioning to net zero, a problem compounded by their complex needs, such as requiring very high temperatures and having pronounced seasonal demand patterns.

Infrastructure upgrades for these rural businesses can cost between £2 million and £60 million with implementation timelines of 5-10 years. To address this, Dr. Nicholson suggests the reinstatement or expansion of capital grant funds or the provision of tax credits. Other proposed solutions include energy service company (ESCO) models, aggregation approaches to pricing reforms, and infrastructure investments.

Establishing funding programs and incentives specifically designed for small and rural industrial emitters is essential for a nationwide net zero transition. Without such support, 23% of industrial installations in the UK, accounting for 3.6 million jobs, risk being excluded from the transition to net zero.

The UK government's current approach to industrial decarbonisation is too rigid and inflexible, favouring a one-size-fits-all solution. Rural Britain is demanding a fighting chance for a successful net zero transition. The decision lies with Westminster: either to power up the provinces or risk the implosion of their net zero legacy.

One success story comes from the container glass industry in Europe, where most manufacturers have moved to electric or hybrid furnaces. This transition, while challenging, demonstrates the potential for rural industries to decarbonise with the right support.

As the UK strives towards its net zero goals, addressing the unique challenges faced by rural industries will be crucial. The future of these industries, and the UK's climate targets, hang in the balance.

Read also: