Church of England's criticism met with non-political resistance by Tice, differing from the usual heated debates seen in Reform circles.

In the realm of British politics, several significant events have unfolded recently, centring around migration, human rights, and the ongoing debate between political parties and religious leaders.

Firstly, the Prime Minister has written a book on European human rights law, a move that could potentially complicate matters given the current political climate.

Meanwhile, ministers may find some respite if the downward trend in channel crossings continues. This could provide them with a window of opportunity to buy some time and space from attacks by the Reform party.

Nigel Farage, leader of the Reform party, has suggested that church leaders may be out of touch with their own congregation. However, squaring up to a man of the cloth may not be a good strategy for Reform when trying to win votes from more moderate shire Tories.

The Archbishop of York has made comments critical of Reform's migration policy, voicing his views on the party's website. In response, Richard Tice, deputy of Reform, has pushed back against these comments.

The former head of the Church of England, Justin Welby, has made frequent interventions into the migration debate. His involvement has added a religious dimension to the ongoing discourse.

Sir Keir Starmer, the current Labour leader, appears to have toughened his language on migration. He stated that those crossing the Channel unlawfully will be detained and sent back. This shift in rhetoric signals a potential hardening of Labour's stance on the issue.

The issue of asylum seekers' rights is causing some Labour figures to question if those rights need reevaluation. This internal debate within the Labour party underscores the complexity of the issue at hand.

Interestingly, former foreign secretary Jack Straw and former home secretary David Blunkett have called for a suspension of the European Convention on Human Rights. This proposal, if implemented, could have far-reaching implications for the protection of human rights in the UK.

On a different note, Home Office sources argue that there are tentative signs that the current approach to migration may be working, as August channel crossings are lower than in previous years. However, if the trend does not continue, the demand for a plan B will become more pronounced.

Lastly, it's worth noting that no politician has been reported to have tried to delay the European Convention on Human Rights. This claim, however, is not substantiated by the provided sources.

In conclusion, the discourse surrounding migration and human rights in the UK remains a complex and evolving issue, with political parties, religious leaders, and the public all playing their part in shaping the narrative.