Skip to content

Increasing Gambling Taxes Doubled by Ex-UK Prime Minister to Aid Impoverished Children

Ex-Prime Minister of the UK, Gordon Brown, endorses IPPR's plan to boost gambling taxes significantly, aiming to alleviate child poverty issues.

Increasing Gambling Taxes Doubled by Ex-UK Prime Minister to Aid Underprivileged Children
Increasing Gambling Taxes Doubled by Ex-UK Prime Minister to Aid Underprivileged Children

Increasing Gambling Taxes Doubled by Ex-UK Prime Minister to Aid Impoverished Children

In a bold move aimed at addressing child poverty in the UK, former Prime Minister Gordon Brown has proposed an increase in taxes on the gambling industry. The proposed tax hike, which is not specific to lotteries or bingo, is designed to target online casinos, slot machines, and other forms of gambling.

Brown argues that the current Remote Gaming Duty (RGD) of 21% is too low compared to other countries, and the sector benefits from tax advantages such as exemption from VAT and very low effective corporation tax rates due to offshore operations. The Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR) projects that such a hike could generate an extra £3.2bn ($4.3bn) annually, funds that could be used to combat urgent social issues such as rising child poverty.

However, the gambling industry and critics, including the Betting and Gaming Council (BGC), have voiced concerns about the proposal. They argue that the sector already pays significant taxes, raising about £4 billion annually in duty, more than the claimed £2.5 billion, and contributes £6.8 billion to the economy. The BGC warns that a punitive tax hike to 50% could cause "untold damage," possibly impacting business sustainability and jobs.

Economists and commentators also caution that while gambling harms and child poverty are real issues, Brown conflates two largely independent problems by linking increased gambling tax directly to child poverty alleviation. Tax increases may not directly or effectively address child poverty as these social issues involve complex causes beyond taxation alone.

The BGC, which represents the interests of gambling operators, has criticized the proposed hike in online casino taxes to 50% from the current 21%. The council's concerns suggest potential challenges to the implementation of the proposed tax hikes. The BGC considers the proposed hikes as economically reckless and believes that they might not generate the tax impetus that is being suggested. Furthermore, they argue that the proposed hikes might lead to more people using unregulated offshore sites.

Child poverty levels in Britain are currently at an all-time high since records began, with levels worse than most countries in Europe. In an attempt to address this issue, Brown has proposed a focus on slot machines and online gambling rather than lotteries or bingo. He has also criticized the cap on child support, which only allows a parent to get child-related tax credits and Universal Credit for their first two children. Brown's plan would eliminate this limitation, potentially providing additional support to families in need.

However, the BGC's stance contradicts Brown's views on the proposed tax hikes. Their criticisms highlight the need for careful consideration of the potential impacts of the proposed tax hikes, ensuring that any changes do not unintentionally harm the industry, the economy, or the very people they aim to help.

  1. The former Prime Minister, Gordon Brown, has suggested an increase in taxes on the gambling industry, specifically targeting online casinos, slot machines, and other forms of gambling, as a means to combat child poverty.
  2. Economists and the Betting and Gaming Council (BGC) have voiced concerns about the proposed tax hike, with the BGC arguing that such a hike could cause "untold damage," potentially impacting business sustainability and jobs in the gambling industry.
  3. Brown's plan to eliminate the cap on child support, which would provide additional support to families in need, faces potential challenges due to the BGC's criticisms of the proposed tax hikes on the gambling industry.

Read also: