Lawyers affiliated with DHCBA pen a letter to the Chief Justice, denying support for the abrupt transfer of Justice Tara Vitasta Ganju.
The Delhi High Court Bar Association (DHCBA) has recently written a letter to the Chief Justice of India (CJI) BR Gavai, expressing concerns about the transfer of Justice Tara Vitasta Ganju from the Delhi High Court to the Karnataka High Court.
The DHCBA, which consists of lawyers practicing in the Delhi High Court, has a significant number of women lawyers as members. The latest development in the ongoing discussion about Justice Ganju's transfer is the DHCBA's request for a reconsideration of the Supreme Court Collegium's recommendation.
In the letter, the President of the DHCBA, Prashant Kumar Singh, has requested the reconsideration of the transfer of Justice Tara Vitasta Ganju. The content of the letter concerns the Supreme Court Collegium's recommendation, but the reasons for the request for reconsideration have not been disclosed.
The transfer of Justice Ganju, if approved, would mark a significant change in the judicial composition of both the Delhi and Karnataka High Courts. However, the outcome of the DHCBA's request for reconsideration is yet to be announced by the Supreme Court Collegium or the Chief Justice of India.
This is not the first time the DHCBA has voiced concerns about the transfer of a judge. In the past, they have expressed their views on similar matters, demonstrating their commitment to upholding the integrity and independence of the judiciary.
The DHCBA's letter to CJI BR Gavai is the latest development in the ongoing discussion about the transfer of Justice Tara Vitasta Ganju. As the situation unfolds, the DHCBA and other legal bodies will continue to monitor the situation closely.
Read also:
- Voting location now active for citizens to cast their ballots.
- Federal clash in California: two legal cases could potentially align, as a notice is published in the Federal Register
- "Local Democrats in the Bronx offering support for Zohran"
- Federalist Society Deserves Gratitude from Trump for Judicial Appointments
