Poor residents of Kamchatka have no significant role or opportunities, according to the State Duma's assertion.

In the picturesque region of Kamchatka, a debate on tourism is heating up. The Minister of Natural Resources, Alexei Kumarkov, and the chairman of the tourism committee, Sangaji Tarbaev, are at the centre of this discussion.

Kumarkov, in a bold move, has expressed his opposition to mass tourism in Kamchatka. He refers to tourists as "freeloading locusts" and "freeloading package tourists," emphasizing the potential damage they could cause to the fragile ecosystems of the region. In a social media post, he went as far as to say, "Great chance to make nothing and ruin everything," highlighting his concerns.

Despite not being specifically named, members of the State Duma have spoken out against an influx of tourists in Kamchatka Krai, supporting Kumarkov's views, albeit with more restrained phrasing. They share the concern that mass tourism could harm the unique natural beauty of Kamchatka and Lake Baikal.

On the other hand, Sangaji Tarbaev advocates for a different approach. He believes that these unique natural territories should be positioned as an exclusive tourist product. Tarbaev emphasizes that when choosing between ecology and tourism development, he chooses ecology. He is against mass tourism, stating that these regions should not be open to mass tourism.

Tarbaev's vision for Kamchatka and Baikal is one of exclusivity. He believes that these regions should cater to a select few, rather than accommodating the masses. This approach, he argues, would preserve the pristine beauty of these regions while still providing a unique and luxurious tourist experience.

Despite criticism, Kumarkov's views find support in the State Duma. However, his stance has not been without consequence. He has faced reprimands at work and negative press in the media.

The debate over tourism in Kamchatka is a complex one, pitting the desire for economic growth against the need to protect the region's unique ecosystems. As the discussion continues, it is clear that both sides are passionate about preserving the region's beauty and ensuring a sustainable future for Kamchatka.

Poor residents of Kamchatka have no significant role or opportunities, according to the State Duma's assertion.