Strife amongst local leaders: a potential jeopardy to democratic governance
In recent years, there has been a growing trend in Germany towards municipal mergers, with a increasing reliance on full-time mayors. However, a series of studies and observations suggest that this trend may be causing more harm than good.
One of the main concerns is the loss of democracy. As smaller communities merge, the sense of citizen participation is often diminished, leading to a threat to the very essence of democracy. This is further compounded by the increasing bureaucracy created by these mergers, which can lead to voter disillusionment.
Moreover, the lack of mayors is another warning sign for our democracy. The constant protests, growing distrust from parts of the community, and the increasing complexity of the mayoral role make it harder for mayors to carry out their duties. This has led some mayors to resign, such as the young mayor in Altheim who stepped down for the sake of their health and family wellbeing.
The destruction of the sense of home is another issue raised by the merger of municipalities. A study shows that these mergers can take away the identity of small communities, leaving residents feeling disconnected and disoriented.
Despite calls from some state governments, such as Thuringia, for municipal mergers to solve these issues, the reality is often quite different. These mergers can create new bureaucracy, voter disillusionment, and often new costs.
On the other hand, some solutions are being proposed. Full-time mayors, for instance, are being seen as a potential solution, even for small municipalities. Bavaria, for example, allows even very small municipalities to elect a full-time mayor, and the costs for this are very low compared to the overall budget.
Proximity to citizens is another key factor. As the town hall becomes further away due to mergers, citizens no longer feel heard. This is why flexible models like mayor teams or intercommunity staff pools are being suggested to relieve volunteers in the mayoral office.
Money would be better spent in the municipalities, where democracy is defended daily, rather than funding NGOs to "save our democracy." A reform of thinking is needed, with fewer regulations and more trust in the municipalities. Legal certainty is important, with responsibility anchored where capacities are, such as at the district level.
However, it's important to note that full-time mayors are not a panacea. They are an honest step towards addressing the complex tasks and public expectations faced by mayors, but they are not a solution in and of themselves.
In conclusion, while municipal mergers may seem like a solution to some, the evidence suggests that they can lead to a loss of democracy, a destruction of community identity, and increased bureaucracy. A more thoughtful approach, focusing on citizen will and participation, is needed to ensure the health and vitality of our communities and our democracy.
