Skip to content

Vendors to Original Equipment Manufacturers Discussing China Threat: Emphasize Uniformity, Prioritize Customer Interaction

Traditional car manufacturers allegedly prioritize creating complex systems that could be compatible with software-controlled vehicle architecture, potentially enhancing their ability to quickly introduce new models in the market, according to supplier industry leaders.

Manufacturers' Suppliers Warn on China Risk: Emphasize Uniformity, Prioritize Customer Interaction
Manufacturers' Suppliers Warn on China Risk: Emphasize Uniformity, Prioritize Customer Interaction

Vendors to Original Equipment Manufacturers Discussing China Threat: Emphasize Uniformity, Prioritize Customer Interaction

In the rapidly evolving automotive industry, traditional automakers are recognizing the need to adapt to stay competitive, particularly in the realm of software-defined vehicles (SDVs). According to Norm Marks, global vice president, automotive industry at NVIDIA, the supply chain should act as a change agent for these traditional automakers.

One area where China is leading the way is in the focus on end-customer experience. Chinese automakers are hyper-focused on this aspect, while Western automakers grapple with internal silos and hierarchies that slow down product planning and cycle speed. China's approach to standardization of systems can lead to faster market entry, and differentiating those systems provides no added value to the end user.

This is evident in the partnership between Chinese automaker BYD and NVIDIA, with BYD committing to making all its vehicles SDVs and utilizing NVIDIA's DRIVE Orin centralized compute platform. Similarly, Rivian's software will power future vehicles across VW's ten automotive brands.

However, legacy automakers face challenges in managing internal-combustion-engine (ICE) and hybrid vehicles that still generate most of their profits, as well as navigating frequent changes in regulations that impact product cycles. U.S. automakers are playing catch-up to China in terms of embracing extended-range battery-electric vehicles.

To compete effectively against Chinese automakers in the SDV space, legacy automakers must adapt their mindsets and organizational structures. A key adaptation is a cultural shift towards software and agility. Legacy companies like Toyota struggle with traditional hierarchical, consensus-driven cultures embedded in hardware mastery and analog efficiency, which hinder rapid software innovation. Adopting an agile, risk-tolerant mindset that prioritizes software development and disruption over stability is critical.

Organizational restructuring is another crucial step. Toyota’s folding of its Digital Transformation Promotion Department into a larger business unit weakened digital change agents. To succeed, automakers must empower dedicated software teams with autonomy, incentive alignment, and leadership committed to digital transformation, avoiding assimilation into legacy structures that stifle change.

Legacy automakers must also collaborate through shared software initiatives. European OEMs are fighting back by forming consortia to develop shared, open-source automotive software for non-differentiating functions. This reduces duplication, accelerates development, and allows companies to focus on proprietary features that define customer experience.

Legacy automakers must also adopt AI-powered proactive quality management. This can reduce warranty costs and improve software quality amid rapid OTA feature rollouts, a crucial competitive factor versus Chinese firms specializing in quick software iterations.

Finally, embracing modern software architectures and OTA monetization models is essential. Transitioning from distributed ECU-based systems to centralized compute and zonal architectures enables more scalable, updatable platforms. Developing software features as a service, with OTA updates generating continuous revenue and customer engagement, is crucial.

In conclusion, legacy automakers must transform their culture and organizational setup to prioritize software agility; empower autonomous digital teams; join or create open software consortia to share foundational technologies; adopt AI-driven quality and rapid software deployment practices; and build modern centralized vehicle software architectures to compete effectively with fast-moving Chinese automakers in the SDV domain.

[1] Source

[2] Source

[3] Source

[4] Source

In the context of the rapidly advancing autonomous driving technology, it's clear that traditional automakers must adapt their focus to embrace electric vehicles (EVs) and software-defined vehicles (SDVs) to remain competitive, learning from China's streamlined approach to the market, as seen in partnerships like BYD and NVIDIA. Nevertheless, outdated organizational structures and hierarchies in the Western automotive industry could hinder progress, impacting the supply chain and product development speed (Source 1, 2). To bridge this gap, US automakers could follow the example set by Chinese companies specializing in quick software iterations, and consider adopting autonomous driving technologies, such as AI-powered proactive quality management, to reduce warranty costs, improve software quality, and enhance the end-user experience (Source 3, 4). Casinos and gambling industries could explore alternative revenue streams by introducing electric vehicles powered by high-performance computing platforms, such as those developed by NVIDIA, within their establishments to offer innovative customer experiences and new opportunities for engagement (a novel, yet untested idea).

Read also: