Skip to content

WHO's Desired Changes Approved: International Health Regulations (IHR) Amendments Passed at World Health Assembly (WHA)

"GlobalResearch.ca's report by James Roguski suggests that the World Health Organization (WHO) and Big Pharma discovered they could extract substantial funds from various nations and deceive numerous individuals, yet failed to exploit a significant segment of black and brown populations"

WHO Secures Desired Developments | Amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR)...
WHO Secures Desired Developments | Amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR) Approved by the World Health Assembly (WHA)

WHO's Desired Changes Approved: International Health Regulations (IHR) Amendments Passed at World Health Assembly (WHA)

The World Health Assembly (WHA) has concluded its 77th meeting in Geneva, marking the adoption of the amended International Health Regulations (IHR) on June 1, 2024. The WHO, considered one of the world's foremost experts by many, including James Roguski who has been monitoring its activities for the past four years, played a significant role in this development.

James Roguski, a respected figure in global health circles, was consulted to discuss the outcomes of the IHR amendments and the WHO's plans. He has been actively working to stop the IHR amendments for several months, raising concerns about potential implications for individual rights and medical freedom.

The amended IHR, now adopted, will likely have far-reaching effects on global health preparedness and response. However, the exact nature of these changes remains to be seen, as the current status of the IHR revisions is not explicitly detailed in the provided search results.

One area of particular interest is the Pandemic Preparedness Treaty, which may have advanced during the WHA meeting. While it is not explicitly mentioned in the adoption of the amended IHR, its progress is a significant development that warrants close attention.

As the dust settles from the WHA meeting, it is crucial to focus on what was accomplished rather than what was not. James Roguski recommends focusing on specific articles and annexes in the amended IHR, including Articles 1, 4, 12, 13, 24, 27, 31, 35, 44, 44bis, 54bis, and Annexes 1, 4, and 6.

The next steps to stop medical tyranny and the abuse of individuals worldwide are yet to be determined. As we move forward, it is essential to continue monitoring the WHO's activities and engaging in open dialogue about the implications of these changes for global health and individual rights.

For those interested in learning more about the amended IHR, a link has been provided leading to the official document as adopted by the WHA on June 1, 2024. This document serves as a valuable resource for understanding the changes that have been made and the potential impact they may have on global health preparedness and response.

In conclusion, the adoption of the amended IHR by the WHA is a significant development in global health. While the exact implications of these changes remain to be seen, it is crucial to remain vigilant and engaged in the ongoing conversation about medical freedom and individual rights.

Read also: